Post by EdmundI don't use it very much, I am mostly using spreadsheets I created a
long time ago. BUT, IF an option disappears in a new release,
wouldn't it be logic to ask the developers what happened?
You could file a bug report. It's what people do, and then the
developers might heed the complaint and change things back.
Of course, you'd have to file the bug report with the LibreOffice
developers directly, not with the Mint developers, because the Mint
developers can only package the software, and perhaps patch it or
customize it so it works together well with the rest of the
distribution.
Post by EdmundMy view on the zillion linux releases each with their own
incompatible repositories must be very clear here, I am absolutely
flabbergasted by the fact so many people run into problems just
because of that but still do NOT agree with me, instead they add
ppa's. :-)
It is YOU who do not understand. Every distribution has its own
repositories, and there is a good reason for that too. It means that
the software that's in the repositories for that particular
distribution has been tested to work on that distribution — as opposed
to software you download from somewhere else on the intergoogles.
Also very importantly, software from the repositories comes with a
checksum and a signature, so that your package manager can check the
package's integrity to see whether it has been compromised, and that it
can verify that the package bears the official signature of the
distribution.
When it comes to PPAs, the package can usually be trusted, although
there is no guarantee, given that PPAs are community-based repositories.
Lastly, if you do want to install software that didn't come with the
distribution and that you cannot find in a PPA, then there are
technologies like Snap and FlatPak, which allow you to install software
in a sandboxed environment, so that it doesn't corrupt the rest of the
system with incompatible libraries, and so that the software can be
bundled with its own libraries.
Snap and FlatPak are both designed to allow the installation of
software that is distribution-agnostic, and because of the sandboxed
environment, you can always safely remove said software again if you
don't like it.
The downside of such a sandboxed approach on the other hand is that the
software won't be perfectly integrated with the rest of the system in
terms of look & feel, exactly because it comes with its own
configuration and its own libraries, whereas the rest of the
distribution is dynamically linked and uses shared libraries.
--
With respect,
= Aragorn =